| First | Prev | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 6595 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Maganlal Kishanlal Godha vs Nanasaheb Udhaorao Gadewar
[LexDoc Id : 350702]
|
SC |
2008 |
Seema Bansal vs Mayank Bansal
[LexDoc Id : 350698]
|
SC |
2008 |
Prashanth Projects Ltd. vs CIT
[LexDoc Id : 349818]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
CIT vs Essar Oil Ltd.
Double Taxation Relief-Income of PE abroad-The assessee had a PE in Oman. It was taxed in Oman on income of it's PE. The profits of PE were not to be included for tax in India, as per Art. 7 of [LexDoc Id : 349131]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
CIT vs Essar Oil Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 349052]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Aatam Gems, Shailesh H. Kothari, Salil Shailesh Kothari and Pratibha Shailesh Kothari vs Oriental Bank of Commerce
[LexDoc Id : 348306]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Avdel Tools and Services vs Trufit Fasteners (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 348301]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Manoj Sharma vs State and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 348294]
|
SC |
2008 |
Babulal Khandelwal and Ors. vs Balkrishan D. Sanghvi and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 348290]
|
SC |
2008 |
CIT vs Dawn View Farms (P) Ltd.
Block Assessment of person not searched-Condition Precedent: Recording satisfaction of AO of person searched-Block period: 1 April 1995 to 7 March 2002. The condition precedent for initiating block-assessment under s.158BD was that the satisfaction of the AO [LexDoc Id : 347547]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2008 |
Sunil Kumar Singh and Ors. vs State of Bihar and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 406630]
|
HC (Patna) |
2008 |
CIT and Anr. vs Tata Lucent Technologies Ltd.
Business loss-Notional loss or gain due to: foreign exchange rate fluctuations-AY 1996-97. The assessee had imported raw materials on credit. It debited a loss of about Rs.1.57crores in respect of unpaid bills, and it credited a [LexDoc Id : 377628]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2008 |
Vijay Jaiswal vs Nisha Jaiswal
[LexDoc Id : 361423]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2008 |
Bhima and Brother vs Assistant Commissioner (Assmt), Commercial Taxes and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 360380]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2008 |
K.R. Subramanian vs OL
Issue of notice to ex-officers of company to file statement of affairs-Notice issued without filing summons, Conviction and sentence based on notice-A reading of s.454(2) of the Companies Act 1956 showed that the ex-officers mentioned in clauses (a) to (d) thereof should be issued notice under rule [LexDoc Id : 355330]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2008 |
Mondri Sreenu vs State of Andhra Pradesh
[LexDoc Id : 353807]
|
SC |
2008 |
Roy Marshall vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 350468]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2008 |
M.V. Ganesh vs CIT
Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme 1998-Arrears of tax, Adjustment of refund-AY 1984-85. The AO had adjusted refund for Assessment Year 1984-85 against tax liability for the Assessment Year 1982-83 under s.155. The said order u [LexDoc Id : 350300]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2008 |
Om Parkash Harbans Lal Sangrur vs CIT
Penalty: Concealment of income-Unexplained cash credits-AY 1986-87. During the search under s.132, certain documents were found showing receipt of loans from 11 persons. The assessee failed to file any info [LexDoc Id : 349896]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2008 |
CIT vs Tulip Finance Ltd.
Depreciation: Rate of depreciation-Asset costing less than Rs.5,000/--The assets used where cost price of each was less than Rs.5,000 were entitled to depreciation at 100 per cent.
Proviso I to s.32(1) of the [LexDoc Id : 349894]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2008 |
UOI and Ors. vs Ram Kumar Thakur
[LexDoc Id : 348298]
|
SC |
2008 |
Narcotic Control Bureau vs Parash Singh
[LexDoc Id : 348296]
|
SC |
2008 |
Mukul Mahto and Ors. vs State of Jharkhand and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 348295]
|
SC |
2008 |
UOI vs Bali Ramu Pawar and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 348291]
|
SC |
2008 |
State of Maharashtra vs Deepti Anil Devasthali and Leena Anil Devasthali
Deepti Anil Devasthali and Leena Anil Devasthali vs State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 348201]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
| |
| First | Prev | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | Next | Last |
| |
